Aurum Codex vs Classic Blackjack
⚡ Quick answer
Aurum Codex vs Classic Blackjack: Classic Blackjack has the higher RTP (99.28% vs 94.7%).
Aurum Codex (Red Tiger) and Classic Blackjack (Red Tiger) compared head-to-head on RTP, volatility, max win and features.
Updated:
Aurum Codex
LOW RTP94.7%
VolatilityMedium-high
Max win4,131×
Reels5-3
ProviderRed Tiger
Free spinsYes
Bonus buyNo
Data-driven from provider specs · RTP is a long-term average
Classic Blackjack
HIGH RTP99.28%
ProviderRed Tiger
Bonus buyNo
Data-driven from provider specs · RTP is a long-term average
| Aurum Codex | Classic Blackjack | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Red Tiger | Red Tiger |
| RTP | 94.7% | 99.28% |
| Volatility | Medium-high | |
| Max win | 4,131× | — |
| Reels | 5-3 | — |
| Released | 15.08.2020 | 15.07.2017 |
Verdict
Classic Blackjack has the higher RTP (99.28% vs 94.7%). Remember RTP is a long-term average and never guarantees a session result.
FAQ — Aurum Codex vs Classic Blackjack
Which has the higher RTP, Aurum Codex or Classic Blackjack?
Classic Blackjack has the higher RTP at 99.28%, versus 94.7% for the other.
Which has the bigger max win?
See the table above.
Can I play both on Stake?
Both titles are typically available on Stake.com, though availability varies by country. Sign up with code AIGAME. 18+.
18+ · Geo-restrictions apply. Stake.com is not available in all jurisdictions.