Big Bad Wolf vs Shields of Lambda
⚡ Quick answer
Big Bad Wolf vs Shields of Lambda: Big Bad Wolf has the higher RTP (97.34% vs 94%).
Big Bad Wolf (Quickspin) and Shields of Lambda (Quickspin) compared head-to-head on RTP, volatility, max win and features.
Updated:
Big Bad Wolf
HIGH RTP97.34%
VolatilityMedium-high
Max win1,225×
Reels5-3
ProviderQuickspin
Free spinsYes
Bonus buyNo
Data-driven from provider specs · RTP is a long-term average
Shields of Lambda
LOW RTP94%
VolatilityHigh
Reels5-5
ProviderQuickspin
Free spinsYes
Bonus buyAvailable
Data-driven from provider specs · RTP is a long-term average
| Big Bad Wolf | Shields of Lambda | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Quickspin | Quickspin |
| RTP | 97.34% | 94% |
| Volatility | Medium-high | High |
| Max win | 1,225× | — |
| Reels | 5-3 | 5-5 |
| Released | 26.06.2012 | 23.05.2024 |
Verdict
Big Bad Wolf has the higher RTP (97.34% vs 94%). Remember RTP is a long-term average and never guarantees a session result.
FAQ — Big Bad Wolf vs Shields of Lambda
Which has the higher RTP, Big Bad Wolf or Shields of Lambda?
Big Bad Wolf has the higher RTP at 97.34%, versus 94% for the other.
Which has the bigger max win?
See the table above.
Can I play both on Stake?
Both titles are typically available on Stake.com, though availability varies by country. Sign up with code AIGAME. 18+.
18+ · Geo-restrictions apply. Stake.com is not available in all jurisdictions.