Mus vs Viral Scratch
⚡ Quick answer
Mus vs Viral Scratch: Viral Scratch has the higher RTP (96.45% vs 96.34%); Viral Scratch offers the bigger max win (60,000× vs 500×).
Mus (R. Franco) and Viral Scratch (R. Franco) compared head-to-head on RTP, volatility, max win and features.
Updated:
Mus
AVERAGE RTP96.34%
Max win500×
ProviderR. Franco
Data-driven from provider specs · RTP is a long-term average
Viral Scratch
AVERAGE RTP96.45%
Max win60,000×
Reels3-3
ProviderR. Franco
Bonus buyNo
Data-driven from provider specs · RTP is a long-term average
| Mus | Viral Scratch | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | R. Franco | R. Franco |
| RTP | 96.34% | 96.45% |
| Volatility | ||
| Max win | 500× | 60,000× |
| Reels | — | 3-3 |
| Released | 10.08.2019 | 15.01.2018 |
Verdict
Viral Scratch has the higher RTP (96.45% vs 96.34%); Viral Scratch offers the bigger max win (60,000× vs 500×). Remember RTP is a long-term average and never guarantees a session result.
FAQ — Mus vs Viral Scratch
Which has the higher RTP, Mus or Viral Scratch?
Viral Scratch has the higher RTP at 96.45%, versus 96.34% for the other.
Which has the bigger max win?
Viral Scratch has the larger max win at 60,000×.
Can I play both on Stake?
Both titles are typically available on Stake.com, though availability varies by country. Sign up with code AIGAME. 18+.
18+ · Geo-restrictions apply. Stake.com is not available in all jurisdictions.